Pull Those Pants UP!
Jan. 26th, 2009 03:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
OK,
For years I have been coached to believe that German wore their pants with high waists (or at least “above the natural waistline, and certainly higher than most modern men are comfortable with”) during the 16th century. This assertion appeared to be borne out in the art from the period. For example, from the “German Single Leaf Woodcuts 1500-1550”, Max Geisberg & Walter Strauss:
And from the back:
So today I was trolling through the new-and-improved-but-stinky-for-downloading-images bildindex, when I was struck by what appeared to be low waist in several extant pairs of pants. This got me curious, so I did some more digging into my own image archives and on several other sites. What I found didn’t jibe with what I have always thought was an accurate statement regarding the height of men’s pants in this period.
Same pair in yellow above, from the back:
Look at where the codpiece lands in relation to the waistline in the woodcuts. Now look at where it lands in the extant pants.
What gives?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-27 12:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-27 12:53 am (UTC)But I just noticed something as I look at these extant garments -- none of them are contemporary with the Landsknecht woodcuts. The woodcuts are from the 1520s and 30s. The only extant garment dated says 1540s-50s, but I would argue that the later date is more correct. These fashionably slashed or paned garments are the later style, contemporary with the Sture garments, when the waistline had dropped to natural waist or hips.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-27 02:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-27 02:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-27 02:18 am (UTC)But what about the knitted pants? They are styled more like the early period and their waist is very low. I have to imagine (because I don't know!) that knitting would be hard to modify the height of?